Home
Deb Geisler
debgeisler
..:::. ..:.:.

November 2009
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30

Deb Geisler [userpic]
LiveJournal censorship based on interests

So, when you set up your LiveJournal account, you maybe typed up a list of interests. Mine include anonymity, archery, geeks, plato (meant to be the computer system, not the Greek), and world domination.

That world domination might just get me in trouble.

By now, you may have heard of the censorship of some LJ accounts based on these lists -- accounts that were actually set up as part of an RPG or to write fanfic. No more accounts, because they had things like "rape" and "pillage" in their interests section.

Could they just remove the interests and have the accounts reinstated? Well, no, sez the LJ crack legal team, because if the RPG characters are then found to have used LJ as a platform for their raping and pillaging, then LJ could be implicated (see "scienter").

And there are apparently people who are survivors of incest, so they have "incest" in their interest list, and they've been suspended, too, in fine Orwellian fashion. Look for the support of others who have been harmed? Not here, by jiggy. Write fiction where characters do anti-social things? No more account for you.

Fans are fighting this...by identifying themselves as fans, and by including a lovely series of specially-crafted icons to tell LJ how they feel.































I really like that last one quite a bit. I'm sure there will be more.

Comments

Nicely summarized.

LJ has apologized, but doesn't seem to understand that having a "zero-tolerance policy" means that overreaction is always preferable to lack of response, thus guaranteeing this sort of thing will happen again.

I like the witchhunt one... ;->

It's funny how some members of LJ management are acting like some members of Wikipedia management - completely overreacting and going off the deep end.

While the one or two people who started the problem appear to be clueless jerks, they actually started with at least one reasonable point - should communities like LJ allow illegal activities like pedophilia? You know and I know that crap like this goes on in online communities. But, instead of using a small incision to get rid of this sites where this was actually going on, they amputated a few limbs and deleted sites based on the say so of roughly two users who are living in a major fantasy world themselves.

Communities don't have activities. People do activities. Communities are tags put on data (postings).

Only activities of people can be illegal. Talking and writing about illegal stuff isn't illegal; otherwise, there would be no newspapers, murder mysteries, or legislative bodies (or for that matter, trials).

Only courts can determine that a particular act was illegal.

LJ is protected by explicit law from legal retribution for postings made by non-employees.

Only activities of people can be illegal. Talking and writing about illegal stuff isn't illegal..

Sorry, but that's not quite correct. If one talks about (reflectively, as it were) illegal activities, one is protected -- unless the discussion is designed to engage in or further the pursuit of criminal activities. In that case, the communication is part of (or all of) a conspiracy crime, and is punishable by law (at least in the U.S.).

There are some other circumstances, too. But I'd like to watch them try to make a case that people discussing two fictional characters doing something (which would be illegal in the real world, or at least this part of it) are engaging in a conspiracy to have those two fictional characters commit a real-world crime.

I've grabbed an icon. Currently, I have 82 unsearchable interests because of LJ's search-blocking software.